Entrepreneur Driven Approach
The entrepreneur-driven approach best integrates
the entrepreneurs’ knowledge on the local context (supply, market
etc.) and his labour’s existing skills and assures a production
tuning to the real local market conditions. The lump sum nature
of the upfront investment subsidy, as well as the performance based
production incentives encourages the entrepreneurs to cost efficient
construction and production tuning.
However, since both, construction and production
tuning are under control of the entrepreneur, the speed of the project
implementation fully depends on the pro-activeness, investment and
management of the entrepreneur. Therefore the entrepreneur driven
approach only functions as long as the project deadlines allow coping
with delays on investment, with management errors by the entrepreneurs
and even with dropouts, if an entrepreneur decides to invest rather
in other businesses than in clean brick production. A project framework
which doesn’t allow dropouts or delays automatically shifts the
entrepreneurial responsibility from the brick maker to the project,
since the project implementation unit will have to take over management
and investments, as soon as delays endanger a timely success. Under
such circumstances the entrepreneur-driven approach turns into an
informal kind of turnkey arrangement with unclear competences and
responsibilities. Vague rules of cooperation endanger the success
of the project and even may generate conflicts between the different
stakeholders, which will finally lead to a bad name of the VSBK
technology. Hence, identifying the right entrepreneur is critical
for the success of the project in an entrepreneur driven approach.
Subsidised turnkey arrangements
Unlike the entrepreneur-driven approach, a turnkey
arrangement allows the project unit to fully control the project
implementation and the related investments. The full control goes
along with full responsibility, since the entrepreneurs’ local knowhow
won’t flow in the establishing of the VSBK as in an entrepreneur
driven approach. Therefore, the implementation of turnkey arrangements
depends on a highly skilled project team which must be perfectly
familiar with the local contexts (supply, labour, market). For this
reason, turnkey arrangement don’t usually suite for a piloting a
new technology, but may be considered as a dissemination mode, once
the technology’s local teething problems are resolved, the local
context is well known and sufficient support services are available
on the market to support the entrepreneur after the handover of
the production unit.
Numerous experiences show that a turnkey arrangement
may assure efficient establishing of new production unit, but since
the entrepreneurs aren’t sitting in the driver seat from the beginning
of the new venture, problems can appear after the kiln is handed
over to entrepreneurs for the commercial production, resulting in
low quality output, losses and bankruptcy, giving the technology
a bad name. Countless abandoned turnkey factories from the 1960-80s
all over the world are witness to the high risk of failure of wrongly
selected approaches.
Tax advantages and a favourable regulatory framework
It has to be kept in mind that shifts towards
cleaner production has its price. Even in the industrial world combinations
of cleaner production and at the same time economic advantages only
coincide in rare cases. That is why parallel development of appropriate
regulations and incentives are of utmost importance. Especially
polluting brick kilns of South Asia are well established, in most
cases they have been operation for more than 50 years and are an
economically attractive business. To shift into a completely unknown
and new technology is not easy for most BTK operators. Hence a favourable
policy regulatory and incentives must always be accompanied with
VSBK technology transfer.
Time required to transfer cleaner brick production
Often time required to transfer cleaner brick
production is under estimated. A VSBK is not plug-and-play device
but technology requiring careful tuning and optimising of the raw
material supply soil processing, green brick making and firing.
These process/practices vary in different places and according to
technologies. It takes considerable time to change these established
practices.
|